People v. Gravesand
This text of 221 A.D.2d 465 (People v. Gravesand) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kreindler, J.), rendered August 12, 1991, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reversing the conviction for criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
As the People correctly concede, since criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree was not among the counts submitted to the jury at a prior trial on the indictment, resulting in a partial verdict, it was fundamental error for the court to submit that count to the jury at the instant trial (see, People v Williams, 133 AD2d 717, 718-719; People v Anderson, 111 AD2d 124).
The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Sanchez, 86 NY2d 27). Thompson, J. P., Joy, Gold-stein and Florio, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
221 A.D.2d 465, 633 N.Y.S.2d 563, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gravesand-nyappdiv-1995.