People v. Graves

71 A.D.3d 470, 899 N.Y.S.2d 146

This text of 71 A.D.3d 470 (People v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Graves, 71 A.D.3d 470, 899 N.Y.S.2d 146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard D. Carruthers, J.), rendered December 3, 2008, convicting defend[471]*471ant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2!% to 5 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s mistrial motion,-made on the basis of an isolated portion of the prosecutor’s summation that allegedly made an improper statement of fact, since that comment was a permissible response to a corresponding portion of the defense summation (see generally People v Overlee, 236 AD2d 133 [1997]). Defendant’s remaining challenges to the summation are unpreserved and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we find no basis for reversal. Concur— Gonzalez, P.J., DeGrasse, Freedman, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Overlee
236 A.D.2d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 A.D.3d 470, 899 N.Y.S.2d 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-graves-nyappdiv-2010.