People v. Graves

251 A.D.2d 746, 675 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 11, 1998
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 251 A.D.2d 746 (People v. Graves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Graves, 251 A.D.2d 746, 675 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Bender, J.), rendered August 5, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

[747]*747In full satisfaction of a 12-count indictment charging him with various drug-related crimes, defendant pleaded guilty to a single count of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. In accordance with the plea agreement, defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to a prison term of 10 to 20 years. On appeal, defendant contends that his guilty plea was involuntary and that the sentence was harsh and excessive. Although defendant stated during the plea allocution that he was coerced by “the system” and was concerned about the sentence he was facing, we nevertheless find that defendant’s guilty plea represented a knowing, voluntary and intelligent choice (see, People v Pressley, 241 AD2d 621; People v Rojas, 238 AD2d 727). Nor are we persuaded that the agreed-upon sentence was harsh or excessive. Defendant had been released on parole only five weeks when he committed the instant offense and, if convicted at trial, defendant would have been exposed to a much lengthier prison sentence (see, People v Feliciano, 240 AD2d 903). Finally, we find no extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence imposed in the interest of justice.

Cardona, P. J., Mercure, Crew III, Carpinello and Graffeo, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Spann
287 A.D.2d 880 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 A.D.2d 746, 675 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6773, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-graves-nyappdiv-1998.