People v. Graves

209 A.D.2d 970, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1018
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1994·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his statements to the police and the lineup identification should be suppressed as the fruits of an unlawful arrest in violation of the rule enunciated in Payton v New York (445 US 573). Because that contention was not raised before the suppression court, it is not preserved for review (see, People v Smith, 55 NY2d 888, 890; People v Martin, 50 NY2d 1029, 1030-1031; People v Major, 195 AD2d 1051). (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Egan, J.— Criminal Possession Weapon, 2nd Degree.) Present—Pine, J. P., Balio, Callahan, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Graves, 209 A.D.2d 970, 619 N.Y.S.2d 1018 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

209 A.D.2d 970 (People v. Graves) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Graves
209 A.D.2d 970 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)