People v. Grassi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grassi

58 A.D.2d 631, 395 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 20, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 631 (People v. Grassi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grassi, 58 A.D.2d 631, 395 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed January 14, 1977, upon his conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a five-year period of probation and case remanded to the County Court to fix the conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In our opinion, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Margett, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Suffolk County, imposed January 14, 1977, upon his conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the sixth degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being an indeterminate term of imprisonment with a maximum of four years. Sentence modified, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, by reducing it to a five-year period of probation and case remanded to the County Court to fix the conditions of probation and for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (subd 5). In our opinion, the sentence was excessive to the extent indicated herein. Margett, J. P., Damiani, Rabin and Mollen, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 631, 395 N.Y.S.2d 624, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grassi-nyappdiv-1977.