People v. Grant

110 A.D.3d 738, 971 N.Y.S.2d 891
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 83 A.D.3d 862

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruchelsman, J.), imposed October 27, 2011, pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2009, codified in CPL 440.46, resentencing him to a determinate term of imprisonment of 15 years, to be followed by a period of post-release supervision of 3 years, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the resentence is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in resentencing the defendant to a determinate term of imprisonment of 15 years, to be followed by a period of postrelease supervision of three years (see Penal Law §§ 70.70 [4] [b] [i]; 70.45 [2] [d]). In view of the defendant’s disciplinary history while incarcerated, his past criminal record, and his history of committing crimes while on parole, a further reduction of the defendant’s sentence is not warranted (see CPL 440.46 [3]; People v Medina, 81 AD3d 853 [2011]; People v Almanzar, 43 AD3d 825 [2007]; People v Newton, 48 AD3d 115 [2007]; see also People v Overton, 86 AD3d 4 [2011]). Skelos, J.P., Balkin, Austin and Sgroi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 110 A.D.3d 738, 971 N.Y.S.2d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

110 A.D.3d 738 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Almanzar
43 A.D.3d 825 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Newton
48 A.D.3d 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Medina
81 A.D.3d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. Overton
86 A.D.3d 4 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)