People v. Grant

278 A.D.2d 834, 722 N.Y.S.2d 929, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13468
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal from judgment insofar as it imposed sentence unanimously dismissed and judgment affirmed. Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that the verdict is contrary to the weight of the evidence (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). “Although defendant presented an alibi defense, the conflicting testimony merely raised issues of credibility, which are best determined by the trier of fact” (People v Melendez, 213 AD2d 1037). Because defendant has served his sentence, his challenge to the severity of the sentence is moot (see, People v Dukes, 156 AD2d 959, 960, lv denied 75 NY2d 918). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Wolfgang, J. — Robbery, 3rd Degree.) Present — Green, J. P., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Balio, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 278 A.D.2d 834, 722 N.Y.S.2d 929, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13468 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

278 A.D.2d 834 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Smart
305 A.D.2d 1110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)