People v. Grant

108 A.D.2d 926, 485 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43261
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Grant. Read the opinion of the Court — 99 A.D.2d 536

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered February 9,1983, convicting him of murder in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

The defendant’s trial testimony constituted direct evidence of many of the principal facts in issue (see, People v Licitra, 47 NY2d 554, 558-559; People v Rumble, 45 NY2d 879, 880). Since the People’s case was not based solely upon circumstantial evidence, the defendant was not entitled to a “moral certainty” charge (People v Ruiz, 52 NY2d 929; People v Barnes, 50 NY2d 375; People v Dukes, 97 AD2d 445). Moreover, the evidence adduced at trial, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620; People v Benzinger, 36 NY2d 29), is sufficient to sustain the conviction. We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Titone, J. P., O’Connor, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grant, 108 A.D.2d 926, 485 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

108 A.D.2d 926 (People v. Grant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Benzinger
324 N.E.2d 334 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
People v. Rumble
383 N.E.2d 108 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Licitra
393 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Barnes
406 N.E.2d 1071 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Ruiz
419 N.E.2d 343 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Dukes
97 A.D.2d 445 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)