People v. Graham
This text of 97 A.D.3d 845 (People v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In 2000, defendant was convicted of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and was sentenced to 6 to 12 years in prison. In 2009, he moved for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 and waived his right to a hearing. County Court denied the motion and this appeal ensued.
We affirm. The record discloses that defendant has a lengthy criminal history, consisting of many drug-related convictions, as well as prior parole violations and prison disciplinary infractions. Under these circumstances, and notwithstanding defendant’s programming achievements while incarcerated, we conclude that County Court properly exercised its discretion in finding that substantial justice would not be served by resentencing defendant (see CPL 440.46 [3]; see e.g. People v Gonzalez, 92 AD3d 798, 799 [2012]; People v Rivera, 92 AD3d 523, 524 [2012]; People v Carpenter, 86 AD3d 721, 721 [2011]).
Peters, P.J., Mercure, Malone Jr., Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.3d 845, 947 N.Y.2d 346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-graham-nyappdiv-2012.