People v. Graham
Opinion
The court’s verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The People disproved defendant’s agency defense beyond a reasonable [294]*294doubt (see People v Herring, 83 NY2d 780). The evidence, viewed as a whole, clearly warranted the conclusion that defendant was a participant in the drug-selling operation and had a working relationship with the other participant. Moreover, “there was no evidence that defendant had any other reason to risk arrest by assisting a total stranger in purchasing drugs” (People v Elvy, 277 AD2d 80, lv denied 96 NY2d 783). There is no basis for disturbing the court’s determinations concerning the undercover officer’s credibility. Concur — Mazzarelli, J.P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Gonzalez, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
299 A.D.2d 293 (People v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.