People v. Graham
This text of 715 N.E.2d 504 (People v. Graham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.
Whether “in any place” in Penal Law § 240.36 includes a private residence was disputed below but conceded by defendant on this appeal. Defendant’s present argument — that the statute so construed is void for vagueness — is unpreserved for our review, as is defendant’s remaining contention.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
715 N.E.2d 504, 93 N.Y.2d 934, 693 N.Y.S.2d 502, 1999 N.Y. LEXIS 1213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-graham-ny-1999.