People v. Grafton

533 N.E.2d 668, 73 N.Y.2d 779, 536 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3354
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 1988·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

[781] OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

As the Appellate Division recognized, the factors to be considered by that court on a motion pursuant to CPL 30.30 are not the same as those determining the reasonableness of an appellant’s request for an extension of time to perfect an appeal. We cannot say that the Appellate Division erred as matter of law in concluding that the period April 20 to August 30, 1985 was reasonable and therefore excludable (CPL 30.30 [4]) on the factors presented in this case.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Grafton, 533 N.E.2d 668, 73 N.Y.2d 779, 536 N.Y.S.2d 738, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3354 (N.Y. 1988).

533 N.E.2d 668 (People v. Grafton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Barry
292 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
People v. Brantley
280 A.D.2d 980 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Womack
263 A.D.2d 409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
People v. Jones
247 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
People v. Scott
172 Misc. 2d 594 (Criminal Court of the City of New York, 1997)
People v. Scotti
232 A.D.2d 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Aaron
201 A.D.2d 574 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Karp
158 A.D.2d 378 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)