People v. Grady

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Grady

253 A.D.2d 828, 677 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9552

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 21, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 253 A.D.2d 828 (People v. Grady) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Grady, 253 A.D.2d 828, 677 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered May 28, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that she had violated conditions thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Jackson, 106 AD2d 93, 98; cf., People v Figueroa, 227 AD2d 501; People v Cannon, 208 AD2d 942). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered May 28, 1997, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court upon a finding that she had violated conditions thereof, upon her admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon her previous conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Jackson, 106 AD2d 93, 98; cf., People v Figueroa, 227 AD2d 501; People v Cannon, 208 AD2d 942). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, O’Brien, Pizzuto and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

253 A.D.2d 828, 677 N.Y.S.2d 509, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grady-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack