People v. Grabowski

2021 NY Slip Op 07424, 155 N.Y.S.3d 866, 200 A.D.3d 1718
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 23, 2021
Docket1033 KA 19-01046
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 07424 (People v. Grabowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Grabowski, 2021 NY Slip Op 07424, 155 N.Y.S.3d 866, 200 A.D.3d 1718 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Grabowski (2021 NY Slip Op 07424)
People v Grabowski
2021 NY Slip Op 07424
Decided on December 23, 2021
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on December 23, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, NEMOYER, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

1033 KA 19-01046

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

v

JOHN M. GRABOWSKI, ALSO KNOWN AS JOHN MICHAEL GRABOWSKI, ALSO KNOWN AS JOHN GRABOWSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.


THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (JOHN J. MORRISSEY OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BATAVIA (ROBERT J. SHOEMAKER OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.



Appeal from a judgment of the Genesee County Court (Charles N. Zambito, J.), rendered April 26, 2019. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his Alford plea of guilty, of rape in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.35 [4]). We agree with defendant that his "waiver of the right to appeal was invalid, because [it] encompassed post-conviction motions" (People v Suarez-Montoya, 183 AD3d 765, 765 [2d Dept 2020]; see People v Byrd, 181 AD3d 1183, 1184 [4th Dept 2020], lv denied 35 NY3d 1025 [2020]). The sentence, however, is not unduly harsh or severe. Defendant's contention that County Court improperly penalized him at sentencing for taking an Alford plea is unpreserved for appellate review (see generally People v Hurley, 75 NY2d 887, 888 [1990]). Finally, the certificate of conviction incorrectly states that defendant pleaded guilty on April 25, 2019, and it must therefore be amended to reflect the correct date of March 25, 2019.

Entered: December 23, 2021

Ann Dillon Flynn

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. King
197 N.Y.S.3d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Blackshear
208 A.D.3d 1635 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 07424, 155 N.Y.S.3d 866, 200 A.D.3d 1718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-grabowski-nyappdiv-2021.