People v. Gould

207 A.D.2d 989, 617 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10200
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 30, 1994·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant pleaded guilty to reckless endangerment in the first degree. We reject the contention of defendant that County Court erred in accepting his guilty plea without a sufficient factual allocution. Because defendant pleaded guilty to a crime lesser than the crimes initially charged, a factual allocution was not necessary (see, People v Pelchat, 62 NY2d 97, 108; People v Clairborne, 29 NY2d 950, 951; People v Nunez, 177 AD2d 656).

We have reviewed the remaining contention raised by defendant and conclude that it is without merit (see, People v [990] Taylor, 65 NY2d 1; see also, CPL 220.60; People v Mayers, 74 NY2d 931). (Appeal from Judgment of Cattaraugus County Court, Himelein, J.—Reckless Endangerment, 1st Degree.) Present—Green, J. P., Balio, Wesley, Callahan and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gould, 207 A.D.2d 989, 617 N.Y.S.2d 687, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10200 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

207 A.D.2d 989 (People v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Plato v. Morrissey
638 F. Supp. 2d 338 (W.D. New York, 2009)
People v. Acoff
289 A.D.2d 1085 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Ortiz
227 A.D.2d 902 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Zimmerman
219 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Tirado
214 A.D.2d 1044 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)