People v. Gould

265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6812

Opinion

Hill, P. J., Crapser, Schenck and Foster, JJ., concur; Heffernan, J., dissents. I dissent and vote to reverse the judgment of conviction on the ground that the remarks of the District Attorney were prejudicial and inflammatory. The trial court made a serious error in permitting such an unwarranted license of tongue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gould, 265 A.D. 981, 38 N.Y.S.2d 598, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6812 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 981 (People v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.