People v. Goulborne

140 A.D.2d 710, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6158

This text of 140 A.D.2d 710 (People v. Goulborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Goulborne, 140 A.D.2d 710, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Opinion

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we are satisfied that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be either unpreserved for appellate review or [711]*711without merit. Thompson, J. P., Brown, Weinstein and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
140 A.D.2d 710, 528 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goulborne-nyappdiv-1988.