People v. Gottfried

2021 NY Slip Op 03331, 194 A.D.3d 1072, 144 N.Y.S.3d 613
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 26, 2021
DocketIndex No. 80012V/19
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 03331 (People v. Gottfried) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gottfried, 2021 NY Slip Op 03331, 194 A.D.3d 1072, 144 N.Y.S.3d 613 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Gottfried (2021 NY Slip Op 03331)
People v Gottfried
2021 NY Slip Op 03331
Decided on May 26, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on May 26, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX, J.P.
FRANCESCA E. CONNOLLY
ANGELA G. IANNACCI
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2020-07508
(Index No. 80012V/19)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Gregory Gottfried, appellant.


Daniel L. Kron, Brooklyn, NY (George C. Grasso of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas E. Walsh II, District Attorney, New City, NY (Jacob B. Sher of counsel; Meghan Garvey on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an amended judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kevin F. Russo, J.), rendered August 31, 2020, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the County Court, Onondaga County (Anthony F. Aloi, J.), upon a finding that he violated a condition thereof, upon his admission, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted sexual abuse in the first degree.

ORDERED that the amended judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that his sentence violated his right to free speech as guaranteed by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Braxton, 121 AD3d 1126) and, in any event, without merit.

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

HINDS-RADIX, J.P., CONNOLLY, IANNACCI and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Gottfried
159 N.Y.S.3d 919 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 03331, 194 A.D.3d 1072, 144 N.Y.S.3d 613, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gottfried-nyappdiv-2021.