People v. Goslar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Goslar

19 A.D.2d 912, 244 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2952

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 8, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 19 A.D.2d 912 (People v. Goslar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Goslar, 19 A.D.2d 912, 244 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2952 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendants appeal from judgments of the County Court of Schuyler County rendered after a trial before the court without a jury convicting them of the crime of escape in violation of section 1694 of the Penal Law committed while confined as youthful offenders in Camp Monterey, a youth rehabilitation facility under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Correction and sentencing them to Elmira Reformatory under the rules and regulations of that institution for a term of not less than one year and not more than two years. It is contended that the enumeration of the crimes, offenses and infractions contained in section 1694 was not intended by the Legislature to embrace a youthful offender. We have held that the statutory term “ offense ” is sufficiently broad to include such a person (People v. Chesley, 282 App. Div. 821). There is ample evidence to sustain the convictions of defendants. There is no proof that their confessions were other than voluntary and it was not error to receive them in evidence. The respective sentences imposed by the trial court for the crime of escape as a' misdemeanor, however, were illegal and erroneous both in respect to the place of commitment and the terms fixed. (Correction Law, § 61, subd. 1; Penal Law, § 1937.) Judgments of conviction affirmed, the sentences set aside and defendants remanded to the County Court of Schuyler County for resentencing. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendants appeal from judgments of the County Court of Schuyler County rendered after a trial before the court without a jury convicting them of the crime of escape in violation of section 1694 of the Penal Law committed while confined as youthful offenders in Camp Monterey, a youth rehabilitation facility under the jurisdiction of the Commissioner of Correction and sentencing them to Elmira Reformatory under the rules and regulations of that institution for a term of not less than one year and not more than two years. It is contended that the enumeration of the crimes, offenses and infractions contained in section 1694 was not intended by the Legislature to embrace a youthful offender. We have held that the statutory term “ offense ” is sufficiently broad to include such a person (People v. Chesley, 282 App. Div. 821). There is ample evidence to sustain the convictions of defendants. There is no proof that their confessions were other than voluntary and it was not error to receive them in evidence. The respective sentences imposed by the trial court for the crime of escape as a' misdemeanor, however, were illegal and erroneous both in respect to the place of commitment and the terms fixed. (Correction Law, § 61, subd. 1; Penal Law, § 1937.) Judgments of conviction affirmed, the sentences set aside and defendants remanded to the County Court of Schuyler County for resentencing. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 912, 244 N.Y.S.2d 37, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2952, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goslar-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack