People v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gordon

42 A.D.3d 964, 837 N.Y.S.2d 885

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 6, 2007

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 42 A.D.3d 964 (People v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gordon, 42 A.D.3d 964, 837 N.Y.S.2d 885 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered October 28, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid. We reject that contention, based on defendant’s response to Supreme Court’s inquiry concerning the waiver as well as the facts and circumstances surrounding the waiver (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Gilbert, 17 AD3d 1164 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 762 [2005]; People v Coleman [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827 [1995]). The unrestricted waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). Present— Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Mario J. Rossetti, A.J.), rendered October 28, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted burglary in the second degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted burglary in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 140.25 [2]), defendant contends that his waiver of the right to appeal was invalid. We reject that contention, based on defendant’s response to Supreme Court’s inquiry concerning the waiver as well as the facts and circumstances surrounding the waiver (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Gilbert, 17 AD3d 1164 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 762 [2005]; People v Coleman [appeal No. 1], 219 AD2d 827 [1995]). The unrestricted waiver by defendant of the right to appeal encompasses his challenge to the court’s suppression ruling (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). Present— Martoche, J.E, Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.3d 964, 837 N.Y.S.2d 885, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gordon-nyappdiv-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack