People v. Gordon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gordon

18 A.D.2d 897, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 19, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 897 (People v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gordon, 18 A.D.2d 897, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on May 3, 1961, granting defendant Gordon’s motion for an order modifying an injunction previously entered to the extent of allowing said defendant to engage in the business of selling securities in the State of New York, unanimously reversed, without costs, on the law and the facts, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for the purpose of conducting a hearing on the merits of the application. The affidavits presented upon this motion show no more than sufficient basis to justify further exploration by way of hearing of defendant’s right to the relief sought; but the propriety of such relief cannot be determined upon affidavits alone (People v. Scanlon, 11 N Y 2d 459, 462). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on May 3, 1961, granting defendant Gordon’s motion for an order modifying an injunction previously entered to the extent of allowing said defendant to engage in the business of selling securities in the State of New York, unanimously reversed, without costs, on the law and the facts, and the matter is remitted to Special Term for the purpose of conducting a hearing on the merits of the application. The affidavits presented upon this motion show no more than sufficient basis to justify further exploration by way of hearing of defendant’s right to the relief sought; but the propriety of such relief cannot be determined upon affidavits alone (People v. Scanlon, 11 N Y 2d 459, 462). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 897, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gordon-nyappdiv-1963.