People v. Goodwin

5 Wend. 251
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 15, 1830·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

[253] By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The oyer and terminer erred. It is not necessary for a court of special sessions to inform a prisoner of his right to be tried by a jury, or that lie should expressly waive such right to render a conviction valid. The law organizing a court of special sessions without jury is perfectly constitutional, as has been decided in Murphy v. The People, 2 Cowen, 815. The act of 1824, Statutes, vol. 6, 297, c. § 47, gives a defendant or prisoner the right to demand a trial by jury, but that the jury trial must expressly be waived to render a conviction good is not required by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goodwin, 5 Wend. 251 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1830).

5 Wend. 251 (People v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sanabria
42 Misc. 2d 464 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
People v. Bedient
31 Misc. 2d 72 (Schuyler County Court, 1961)
Miller v. Commonwealth
14 S.E. 161 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1892)
People ex rel. Sammons v. Wandell
28 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 515 (New York Supreme Court, 1880)
People ex rel. Brown v. Sheriff
2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 270 (Illinois Circuit Court, 1877)
People v. Moore
3 Park. Cr. 465 (New York Supreme Court, 1857)
People ex rel. Booth v. Fisher
20 Barb. 652 (New York Supreme Court, 1855)