People v. Goodwin

2016 NY Slip Op 7341, 144 A.D.3d 843, 40 N.Y.S.3d 274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Goodwin. Read the opinion of the Court — 126 A.D.3d 610
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 2016·No. 2015-08730·Published

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowling, J.), imposed August 14, 2015, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-268 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People v Mendez, 128 AD3d 854 [2015]).

Eng, P.J., Austin, Roman, Hinds-Radix and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goodwin, 2016 NY Slip Op 7341, 144 A.D.3d 843, 40 N.Y.S.3d 274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

2016 NY Slip Op 7341 (People v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Mendez
128 A.D.3d 854 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)