People v. Goodwin
198 N.W.2d 875, 40 Mich. App. 469, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1144
This text of 198 N.W.2d 875 (People v. Goodwin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
People v. Goodwin, 198 N.W.2d 875, 40 Mich. App. 469, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1144 (Mich. Ct. App. 1972).
Opinion
Memorandum Opinion. Defendant was convicted of assault with intent to rob while armed, and appeals. The people have filed a motion to affirm.
Upon examination of the briefs and record, it is manifest that the question sought to be reviewed is so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.
Motion to affirm granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
198 N.W.2d 875, 40 Mich. App. 469, 1972 Mich. App. LEXIS 1144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goodwin-michctapp-1972.