People v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Goodman

291 A.D.2d 569, 738 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1963

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 25, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 291 A.D.2d 569 (People v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Goodman, 291 A.D.2d 569, 738 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1963 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered December 2, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[570]*570Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his previously-entered plea of guilty without holding a hearing (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926). The defendant’s bare claim of innocence was unsubstantiated and refuted by his earlier admission of guilt (see, People v Quijada-Lopez, 256 AD2d 478; People v Bonds, 254 AD2d 430).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered December 2, 1998, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[570]*570Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion to withdraw his previously-entered plea of guilty without holding a hearing (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926). The defendant’s bare claim of innocence was unsubstantiated and refuted by his earlier admission of guilt (see, People v Quijada-Lopez, 256 AD2d 478; People v Bonds, 254 AD2d 430).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, Krausman, McGinity and Cozier, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

291 A.D.2d 569, 738 N.Y.S.2d 245, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1963, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goodman-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack