People v. Goodhue

22 P. 66, 80 Cal. 199, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 887
California Supreme Court·Decided August 5, 1889·No. No. 13089·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Works, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate a judgment. The judgment was rendered October 30, 1865, and this motion was made December 31,1888.

We know of no provision of law which can be held to authorize the vacation of a judgment on a mere motion after so long a time. We have a provision authorizing such a proceeding within a limited time on certain grounds enumerated. (Code Civ. Proc., sec. 473; People v. Mullan, 65 Cal. 396.)

The motion here is made by the grantee of the judgment defendant, and is based on two grounds, viz., that the court rendering the judgment had not jurisdiction of the person of the defendant, and that he had, before the suit was brought, fully paid the sum of money which was the basis of the action.

A judgment cannot be attacked in this informal way years after its rendition.

Order affirmed.

Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., and Thornton, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goodhue, 22 P. 66, 80 Cal. 199, 1889 Cal. LEXIS 887 (Cal. 1889).

22 P. 66 (People v. Goodhue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Liuzza v. Bell
104 P.2d 1095 (California Court of Appeal, 1940)
Lake v. Bonynge
118 P. 535 (California Supreme Court, 1911)
Elliott v. Bastian
40 P. 713 (Utah Supreme Court, 1895)
People ex rel. Schwartz v. Temple
37 P. 414 (California Supreme Court, 1894)
In re Estate of Welch
3 Coffey 303 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1894)
Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé Railroad
32 P. 452 (California Supreme Court, 1893)
People v. Blake
24 P. 313 (California Supreme Court, 1890)