People v. González Suárez

75 P.R. 409
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedOctober 29, 1953
DocketNo. 15482
StatusPublished

This text of 75 P.R. 409 (People v. González Suárez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. González Suárez, 75 P.R. 409 (prsupreme 1953).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Ortiz

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The People of Puerto Rico filed two informations in the former District Court of Puerto Rico, Ponce Section, against Gumersindo González Suárez for two alleged violations of the Weapons Act of Puerto Rico (Act No. 17, approved January 19, 1951, Sess. Laws, p. 426), as subsequently amended, and especially, in so far as applicable here, by Act No. 397, approved May 10, 1951 (Sess. Laws, p. 992). Only one joint trial was held of both cases and the Court of Ponce, after hearing the evidence of both parties, found the accused guilty of the two counts and sentenced him to six-months imprisonment in jail in each case, to be served concurrently.

The accused appealed to this Court from both sentences and filed one joint brief for both cases assigning several errors. We shall consider the cases separately. One of them charges failure to register or declare in writing a pistol, and the other unlawful carrying of the same pistol.

REGISTRATION OR INSCRIPTION OP THE WEAPON

In the information in case number C-1966 of the Ponce Section of the former District Court of Puerto Rico, entitled “Violation of the Weapons Registration Act”, it is alleged, briefly, that the Prosecuting Attorney filed an information for a violation of Act No. 17 of January 19, 1951 (Weapons Act) on the ground that the accused, “sometime in September, 1951, in Ponce, Puerto Rico, which is a part of the Judicial District of Puerto Rico, then and there, willfully and unlawfully, had and carried on his person a pistol without having declared the same at any time in writing, to the Chief of the Insular Police of Ponce, Puerto Rico, which is the [411]*411town where the accused resided at the time he had and carried the said firearm.”

The evidence of the People related essentially to the theory that on September 22, 1951, on Húcar Street of Ponce, and as a result of an argument that took place at a dance, the accused took out a pistol from his pocket and fired it. The evidence of the defendant, which the trial court did not believe, tended to prove that it was another person and not the accused who carried and discharged the weapon. After the evidence of the People was offered, the following took place:

“Mr. Noriega (attorney for the accused) : Your Honor, the prosecuting attorney proposed that we stipulate that this man’s pistol is not registered. We agree that it is not because he has none to register.
“Prosecuting Attorney Morales: That is the stipulation. It is thus submitted.
“Judge: The Court approves the stipulation.”

Although the accused and appellant has not raised the question, the sentence appealed from should be reversed and set aside in the case of the alleged nonregistration of a weapon, since the facts alleged in the information are not sufficient to constitute a public offense.

Under Act No. 14 of July 8, 1936 (Spec. Sess. Laws, p. 128) as subsequently amended, the possession of a weapon which is not registered in the municipality or police district where accused resided constituted an offense in itself. Let us examine the provisions of the Weapons Act (No. 17 of January 19, 1951, as amended). Section 38, which applies here, provides as follows:

“Section 38. — Any person convicted of violating Section 6, Section 7, or Section 29 of this Act shall be punished as follows:
“(a) by imprisonment in jail for a term of not less than six (6) months nor more than two (2) years; or
“(b) by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of not less than one (1) year nor more than three (3) years, when [412]*412previously convicted for the commission of any of the offenses referred to in Section 17 of this Act; or
“(c) by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of not less than two (2) years nor more than five (5) years, when the weapon is used for the commission or while committing any of the felonies specified in Section 17 hereof.
“(d) by imprisonment in jail for a term of not less than six (6) months nor more than two (2) years when the weapon is used in the commission of any of the misdemeanors specified in Section 17 of this Act.”

The penalties imposed are applicable to the violations enumerated in §§ 6, 7 and 29 of the Act. Sections 6 and 7 provide as follows:

“Section 6. — Any person who has or possesses any pistol, revolver, or other firearm without having a license therefor issued as hereinafter provided, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, if previously convicted of any violation of this Act, or of any of the offenses specified in Section 17 hereof, or uses the weapon in the commission of any of such offenses, shall be guilty of a felony.
“Section 7. — Any person who bears, carries, or transports any pistol, revolver or other firearm without having a license therefor issued as hereinafter provided, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, if previously convicted of any violation of this Act or of any of the offenses specified in Section 17 hereof, or uses the weapons in the commission of any of such offenses, shall be guilty of a felony.”

Under §§ 6 and 7 quoted above, the possession, bearing or carrying of a pistol,' revolver or other firearm is an offense, if the person concerned has not secured a license. It is stated in the information under consideration (C-1966 of the Court of Ponce) that the accused had and carried on his person a pistol which had not been declared at any time, in writing, before the Chief of the Insular Police of Ponce, Puerto Rico, the residence of the accused. The information does not contain the essential elements of the offenses prescribed in §§ 6 and 7, nor was it specially alleged or proved that accused had failed to secure the corresponding license. People v. Rivera, 73 P.R.R. 402.

[413]*413Section 29, which is the last of the three Sections referred to in § 38, in prescribing the penalties, provides as follows:

“Section 29.— (a) The Chief of Police of Puerto Rico shall organize the Weapons Register created in the General Police Headquarters under Act No. 14, approved July 8, 1936, as subsequently amended, conforming the organization and operation thereof to the provisions of this Act, and keeping the same in a systematic and orderly manner, so that the names of the persons having weapons registered in Puerto Rico, as well as the essential details concerning the weapon registered, may be easily found. Such register shall be sealed with the Police seal and shall be properly guarded.
“(b) Every firearm authorized to be had and possessed after this Act takes effect, shall be registered in the Weapons Register provided for in the preceding subdivision, in case it has not been previously registered. If such weapon does not bear a serial number, or if the same is illegible, the holder shall have his full name engraved on the steel on the rear end of the butt of the weapon, and shall so set forth in his declaration. The Chief of the Police of Puerto Rico shall deliver to the declarant a record of such registration.
“(c) The firearms authorized to be had, possessed, or carried, under paragraphs 2, 8 and 4 of subdivision (a)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 P.R. 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gonzalez-suarez-prsupreme-1953.