People v. Gonzalez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 A.D.3d 1003
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 4, 2016·No. 141 4060/13·Published

Opinion

People v Gonzalez (2016 NY Slip Op 00774)
People v Gonzalez
2016 NY Slip Op 00774
Decided on February 4, 2016
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 4, 2016
Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Acosta, Andrias, JJ.

141 4060/13

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent, —

v

Mark Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant.


Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Lauren J. Springer of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Lindsey Richards of counsel), for respondent.



An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Edward McLaughlin, J.), rendered on or about April 8, 2014,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 4, 2016

CLERK

Counsel for appellant is referred to

§ 606.5, Rules of the Appellate

Division, First Department.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

People v. Gonzalez (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431