People v. Gonzalez

124 A.D.3d 525, 998 N.Y.S.2d 624
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 96 A.D.3d 875
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 26, 2015·No. 14018 3137/09·Published

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles H. Solomon, J.), rendered April 6, 2010, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of two to four years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There is no basis for disturbing the jury’s credibility determinations. Although the victim could provide only limited information, the jury properly credited an officer’s testimony that he had a full opportunity to observe this pickpocketing incident.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence.

Concur— Tom, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Moskowitz and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 124 A.D.3d 525, 998 N.Y.S.2d 624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

124 A.D.3d 525 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Danielson
880 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)