People v. Gonzalez

305 A.D.2d 231, 758 N.Y.S.2d 494, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5532
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D.2d 637

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Goldberg, J.), rendered on or about April 10, 2002, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 33A to 7V2 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant did not preserve his contention that he was deprived of his right to address the court prior to the imposition of sentence, as provided by CPL 380.50 (1), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court sufficiently complied with the statute (see People v McClain, 35 NY2d 483, 491-492 [1974], cert denied sub nom. Taylor v New York, 423 US 852 [1975]).

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur— Andrias, J.P., Williams, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 305 A.D.2d 231, 758 N.Y.S.2d 494, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5532 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 231 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. McClain
323 N.E.2d 685 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Taylor v. New York
423 U.S. 852 (Supreme Court, 1975)