People v. Gonzalez

288 A.D.2d 2, 732 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10150
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D.2d 1061

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Edward Davidowitz, J.), rendered October 28, 1999, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis upon which to disturb the jury’s determinations concerning identification. The evidence featured testimony that the victim, who had an ample opportunity to observe defendant and accurately described defendant and his clothing, followed defendant to a building where he was arrested. The jury’s mixed verdict does not warrant a contrary conclusion (see, People v Rayam, 94 NY2d 557).

Defendant’s challenge to the court’s Allen charge is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the Allen charge, viewed as a whole, was balanced and not coercive (see, People v Ford, 78 NY2d 878). Concur — Sullivan, P. J., Rosenberger, Nardelli, Rubin and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 288 A.D.2d 2, 732 N.Y.S.2d 156, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

288 A.D.2d 2 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Rayam
729 N.E.2d 694 (New York Court of Appeals, 2000)
People v. Ford
78 N.Y.2d 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)