People v. Gonzalez

254 A.D.2d 370, 678 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10747
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 221 A.D.2d 203

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rutledge, J.), both rendered September 26, 1996, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts, one as to each indictment), upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the court did not err [371]*371in denying the motions to have assigned trial counsel relieved. The record does not indicate the existence of irreconcilable conflict between the defendant and assigned trial counsel (see, People v Porter, 220 AD2d 540; cf., People v Sides, 75 NY2d 822).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Santucei, Altman and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 254 A.D.2d 370, 678 N.Y.S.2d 531, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10747 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

254 A.D.2d 370 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Sides
551 N.E.2d 1233 (New York Court of Appeals, 1990)
People v. Porter
220 A.D.2d 540 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)