People v. Gonzalez

198 A.D.2d 432, 605 N.Y.S.2d 914
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D.2d 283

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.) rendered July 11, 1991, convict[433]*433ing him of burglary in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record indicates that the defendant’s plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered (see, People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9) and provides no support for his claim that he was coerced into pleading guilty.

Based on the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel at the plea or sentencing proceedings (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799).

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 198 A.D.2d 432, 605 N.Y.S.2d 914 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

198 A.D.2d 432 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Harris
459 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Satterfield
488 N.E.2d 834 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)