People v. Gonzalez

193 A.D.2d 755, 598 N.Y.S.2d 986
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 168 A.D.2d 283

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Leahy, J.), rendered July 17, 1990, convicting him of kidnapping in the second degree and criminal use of a firearm in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defen[756]*756dant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). The defendant’s contention in his supplemental pro se brief that his sentence was excessive is frivolous (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Bracken, J. P., Balletta, Eiber, O’Brien and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 193 A.D.2d 755, 598 N.Y.S.2d 986 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 755 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
People v. Gonzalez
393 N.E.2d 987 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Paige
54 A.D.2d 631 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)