People v. Gonzalez

104 A.D.2d 1007, 480 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20440
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 22, 1984·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lakritz, J.), rendered April 19,1982, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Contrary to defendant’s contention on appeal, the Trial Judge did not err in denying his motion to dismiss based upon the People’s failure to prove a prima facie case of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree. Eyewitness testimony set forth the requisite elements of knowing possession of a loaded firearm (Penal Law, § 265.02, subd [4]; People v Cohen, 57 AD2d 790). Nor was it error for the Trial Judge to deny defendant’s request for a missing witness charge; potential witnesses were [1008]*1008not under the influence or control of the People so as to trigger the need for such instructions (People v Dillard, 96 AD2d 112; People v Alamo, 63 AD2d 6). Finally, defendant’s sentence of five years’ probation is not harsh or excessive in light of the seven-year maximum term of imprisonment which he could have received (Penal Law, § 70.00, subd 2, par [d]). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 104 A.D.2d 1007, 480 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20440 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

104 A.D.2d 1007 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Clarence C.
166 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Davis
134 A.D.2d 510 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)