People v. Gonzalez

33 A.D.2d 781, 307 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2672
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 38 A.D.2d 906

Opinion

In a eoram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 21, 1967, which denied the application without a hearing. Order affirmed. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Brennan and Rabin, JJ., concur; Christ and Hopkins, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse the order and remit the proceeding to the Criminal Term for a hearing and a new determination, with the following memorandum: In his reply affidavit, defendant asserted that Assistant District Attorney Baumann promised that defendant would be sentenced as a first-felony offender on a charge of robbery in the third degree and that this promise was not kept. An unkept promise as to sentence is a valid coram nobis ground, if proved, and defendant’s claim is not incredible as a matter of law; nor is it refuted by unquestionable documentary evidence (People v. Bagley, 23 N Y 2d 814; People v. Granello, 18 N Y 2d 823; People v. Weldon, 17 N Y 2d 814; cf. People v. Randolph, 25 N Y 2d 765).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzalez, 33 A.D.2d 781, 307 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1969 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2672 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1969).

33 A.D.2d 781 (People v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.