People v. Gonzales

305 A.D.2d 614, 759 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5663
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 19, 2003·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Latella, J.), rendered November 7, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defense attorney’s cross-examination of the undercover officer justified the People’s subsequent questioning of the officer on redirect examination (see generally People v Melendez, 55 NY2d 445, 451 [1982]; People v Johnson, 296 AD2d 422 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 537 [2002]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., McGinity, Luciano and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzales, 305 A.D.2d 614, 759 N.Y.S.2d 360, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5663 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

305 A.D.2d 614 (People v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gonzales
15 A.D.3d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)