People v. Gonzales

52 A.D.2d 789, 383 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12577
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 66 A.D.2d 828

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County, rendered January 9, 1975, convicting the defendant upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree and sentencing him as a second felony offender to a term of from 4½ to 9 years, unanimously reversed, on the law, and the indictment dismissed. This matter is foreclosed by the opinion of this court in the appeal of the appellant’s codefendant, People v Marrero (51 AD2d 513), in which this court acknowledged the impropriety of the show-up. Whereas in that case it was concluded that there was sufficient independent basis to support the in-court identification of the defendant Marrero, we find that in this case the victim was not in a position to observe this defendant and, therefore, the show-up being improper, the in-court identification was thereby tainted (see Stovall v Denno, 388 US 293, 301-302), and cannot be otherwise resurrected. (United States v Wade, 388 US 218.) Concur—Stevens, P. J., Kupferman, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gonzales, 52 A.D.2d 789, 383 N.Y.S.2d 332, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 789 (People v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Wade
388 U.S. 218 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Stovall v. Denno
388 U.S. 293 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Helsel v. Helsel
51 A.D.2d 513 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)