People v. Gomez
297 A.D.2d 388, 746 N.Y.2d 609, 746 N.Y.S.2d 609, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 26, 2002·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Since the defendant withdrew his request that the court charge sexual abuse in the third degree as a lesser-included offense, his contention regarding this issue is waived and unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Ritter, J.P., Feuerstein, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Gomez, 297 A.D.2d 388, 746 N.Y.2d 609, 746 N.Y.S.2d 609, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8139 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).
297 A.D.2d 388 (People v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
HAMILTON, ADAM J., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
People v. Hamilton
96 A.D.3d 1518 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)