People v. Goldwire

2019 NY Slip Op 503
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 24, 2019
Docket108963
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 503 (People v. Goldwire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Goldwire, 2019 NY Slip Op 503 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

People v Goldwire (2019 NY Slip Op 00503)
People v Goldwire
2019 NY Slip Op 00503
Decided on January 24, 2019
Appellate Division, Third Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: January 24, 2019

108963

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

DUSHON GOLDWIRE, Appellant.


Calendar Date: January 4, 2019
Before: Lynch, J.P., Clark, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ.

David M. Abbatoy, Rochester, for appellant.

Martin Smith, Special Prosecutor, Binghamton, for respondent.



MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Broome County (Northrup Jr., J.), rendered September 29, 2016, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.

In satisfaction of an eight-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. County Court sentenced defendant as a second felony offender to an agreed-upon prison term of eight years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, contending that the sentence is harsh and excessive. We disagree. Given defendant's extensive criminal history, the advantageous nature of the plea that satisfied a multicount indictment and the fact that defendant consented to the sentence as part of extensive plea negotiations, we find no abuse of discretion or extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Gresham, 163 AD3d 1064, 1065 [2018]; People v Lemon, 137 AD3d 1422, 1423 [2016], lv denied 27 NY3d 1135 [2016]).

Lynch, J.P., Clark, Aarons, Rumsey and Pritzker, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lemon
137 A.D.3d 1422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 503, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goldwire-nyappdiv-2019.