People v. Goldstone

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Goldstone

52 A.D.2d 532, 382 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12064

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 6, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 52 A.D.2d 532 (People v. Goldstone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Goldstone, 52 A.D.2d 532, 382 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12064 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered January 17, 1975, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery first degree, grand larceny third degree and assault second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 to 16 years for robbery, 2 to 4 years for larceny, and 3 Yz to 7 years for assault, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction of grand larceny, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The People concede that the grand larceny count is a lesser included, concurrent count of robbery in the first degree and that the conviction of the latter requires a dismissal of the former. (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848.) We have examined the other points raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, rendered January 17, 1975, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of robbery first degree, grand larceny third degree and assault second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of 8 to 16 years for robbery, 2 to 4 years for larceny, and 3 Yz to 7 years for assault, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction of grand larceny, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed. The People concede that the grand larceny count is a lesser included, concurrent count of robbery in the first degree and that the conviction of the latter requires a dismissal of the former. (People v Grier, 37 NY2d 847, 848.) We have examined the other points raised by the appellant and find them to be without merit. Concur—Kupferman, J. P., Murphy, Lupiano, Silverman and Nunez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 A.D.2d 532, 382 N.Y.S.2d 285, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goldstone-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack