People v. Goldsmith

New York Court of Appeals

People v. Goldsmith

164 N.E. 593, 249 N.Y. 586, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 938

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 20, 1928

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 164 N.E. 593 (People v. Goldsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Goldsmith, 164 N.E. 593, 249 N.Y. 586, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 938 (N.Y. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of Special Sessions reversed and information dismissed upon the ground that there is no evidence that defendant held himself out to the public as being entitled to practice *587 law within the meaning of section 270 of the Penal Law. (See People v. Alfani, 227 N. Y. 334.)

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ. Not sitting: O’Brien, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of Special Sessions reversed and information dismissed upon the ground that there is no evidence that defendant held himself out to the public as being entitled to practice *587 law within the meaning of section 270 of the Penal Law. (See People v. Alfani, 227 N. Y. 334.)

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ. Not sitting: O’Brien, J.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 N.E. 593, 249 N.Y. 586, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goldsmith-ny-1928.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack