People v. Goldsmith

164 N.E. 593, 249 N.Y. 586, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 938
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 20, 1928·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of Special Sessions reversed and information dismissed upon the ground that there is no evidence that defendant held himself out to the public as being entitled to practice *587 law within the meaning of section 270 of the Penal Law. (See People v. Alfani, 227 N. Y. 334.)

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Andrews, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ. Not sitting: O’Brien, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goldsmith, 164 N.E. 593, 249 N.Y. 586, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 938 (N.Y. 1928).

164 N.E. 593 (People v. Goldsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spivak v. Sachs
211 N.E.2d 329 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
People v. Stoddard
157 Misc. 153 (New York County Courts, 1935)
Mendelson v. Gogolick
243 A.D. 115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
People v. Weil
237 A.D. 118 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1932)
People v. McCarthy
165 N.E. 810 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)