People v. Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Goldman

264 A.D. 863, 35 N.Y.S.2d 320, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5154

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 863 (People v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Goldman, 264 A.D. 863, 35 N.Y.S.2d 320, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn [County of Kings], convicting him of the crime of petit larceny. Judgment reversed on the law, information dismissed, and the defendant discharged. In our opinion, as matter of law, this record does not disclose evidence establishing the guilt of the defendant of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn [County of Kings], convicting him of the crime of petit larceny. Judgment reversed on the law, information dismissed, and the defendant discharged. In our opinion, as matter of law, this record does not disclose evidence establishing the guilt of the defendant of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell and Adel, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment of conviction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 863, 35 N.Y.S.2d 320, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goldman-nyappdiv-1942.