People v. Goldberger

35 N.Y. Crim. 328, 168 N.Y.S. 578
New York Court of Special Session·Decided December 11, 1916·Published

Opinions

Edwards, J. (concurring):

The penal quality of the statute must be borne in mind. Kosher meat and poultry market ” means a place where such meat and poultry are sold,— not necessarily exclusively. This inscription on the defendant’s window did not constitute a declaration that all the meat sold or offered for sale in the [329]*329premises was “ kosher ” meat, nor was it a declaration that such meat was there for sale at all times.

I vote to acquit on the ground that the evidence does not show that the defendant, “ with intent to defraud, sold or exposed for sale any meat and falsely represented the same to be kosher.”

Herbert, J., concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goldberger, 35 N.Y. Crim. 328, 168 N.Y.S. 578 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1916).

35 N.Y. Crim. 328 (People v. Goldberger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fox's Adm'rs v. Commonwealth
16 Va. 1 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1860)