People v. Goldbeck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Goldbeck

193 A.D.2d 617, 597 N.Y.S.2d 602

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 617 (People v. Goldbeck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Goldbeck, 193 A.D.2d 617, 597 N.Y.S.2d 602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered November 21, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor exercised [618]*618peremptory challenges to potential venirepersons in a racially-motivated manner, violating the standard established by Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79), is supported by the record (see, People v Brown, 193 AD2d 611 [decided herewith]).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered November 21, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor exercised [618]*618peremptory challenges to potential venirepersons in a racially-motivated manner, violating the standard established by Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79), is supported by the record (see, People v Brown, 193 AD2d 611 [decided herewith]).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 617, 597 N.Y.S.2d 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-goldbeck-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack