People v. Goldbeck

193 A.D.2d 617, 597 N.Y.S.2d 602
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Goldbeck. Read the opinion of the Court — 218 A.D.2d 670

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldstein, J.), rendered November 21, 1989, convicting him of burglary in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered. No questions of fact have been raised or considered.

The defendant’s contention that the prosecutor exercised [618]*618peremptory challenges to potential venirepersons in a racially-motivated manner, violating the standard established by Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79), is supported by the record (see, People v Brown, 193 AD2d 611 [decided herewith]).

We have examined the defendant’s remaining contentions and find that they are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Sullivan, J. P., Balletta, Lawrence and Eiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goldbeck, 193 A.D.2d 617, 597 N.Y.S.2d 602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

193 A.D.2d 617 (People v. Goldbeck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Batson v. Kentucky
476 U.S. 79 (Supreme Court, 1986)
People v. Brown
193 A.D.2d 611 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)