People v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gold

7 A.D.2d 739, 180 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3988

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 8, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 A.D.2d 739 (People v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gold, 7 A.D.2d 739, 180 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3988 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, convicting appellant of forgery in the second degree on four indictments which had been consolidated for trial and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve not less than 10 nor more than 20 years on each indictment, the terms to run concurrently, and (2) from said sentence. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to not less than 5 nor more than 10 years on each indictment, the terms to run concurrently. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed. Under the circumstances the sentence imposed was, in our opinion, excessive. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal (1) from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County, convicting appellant of forgery in the second degree on four indictments which had been consolidated for trial and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to serve not less than 10 nor more than 20 years on each indictment, the terms to run concurrently, and (2) from said sentence. Judgment modified on the facts by reducing the sentence to not less than 5 nor more than 10 years on each indictment, the terms to run concurrently. As so modified, judgment unanimously affirmed. Under the circumstances the sentence imposed was, in our opinion, excessive. No separate appeal lies from the sentence, which has been reviewed on the appeal from the judgment of conviction. Present — Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 A.D.2d 739, 180 N.Y.S.2d 723, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3988, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gold-nyappdiv-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack