People v. Gold

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gold

268 A.D. 817, 49 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3600

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 28, 1944

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 817 (People v. Gold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gold, 268 A.D. 817, 49 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment so far as it convicts defendant of the crime of assault, second degree, and sentences him to one to two years’ imprisonment on that charge reversed on the law and otherwise judgment affirmed. Memorandum: The judgment appealed from convicts defendant on both counts of an indictment charging him (in the first count thereof) with the crime of sodomy (Penal Law, § 690) and (in the second count thereof) with the crime of assault, second degree (Penal Law, § 242). The jury returned a verdict of guilty under the first count and of not guilty under the second count. Being of the opinion that the jury had mistaken the law, the court explained to the jury the reasons for that opinion and directed the jury to reconsider its verdict. Upon reconsideration, the jury returned a verdict of guilty under both counts of the indictment. Section 447 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits the court, in a proper case, to direct the jury to reconsider a verdict of guilty, but forbids its reconsideration of a verdict of acquittal. The court should have received and entered the verdict of not guilty on the second count. Where part of the judgment is valid and the illegal part is severable from that part which is legal, the appellate court is authorized to reverse the illegal part and affirm the residue (Code Grim. Pro. § 543; see, also, Syracuse & Tully Plank Road Co. v. The People, 66 Barb. 25). We have examined the facts and find evidence sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment of conviction should be corrected (a) by reversing on the law that part which adjudges defendant guilty of the crime of assault, second degree, and sentences him to one to two years’ imprisonment on that charge and (b) by affirming that part which adjudges defendant guilty of the crime of sodomy. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crimes of sodomy and assault, second degree.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment so far as it convicts defendant of the crime of assault, second degree, and sentences him to one to two years’ imprisonment on that charge reversed on the law and otherwise judgment affirmed. Memorandum: The judgment appealed from convicts defendant on both counts of an indictment charging him (in the first count thereof) with the crime of sodomy (Penal Law, § 690) and (in the second count thereof) with the crime of assault, second degree (Penal Law, § 242). The jury returned a verdict of guilty under the first count and of not guilty under the second count. Being of the opinion that the jury had mistaken the law, the court explained to the jury the reasons for that opinion and directed the jury to reconsider its verdict. Upon reconsideration, the jury returned a verdict of guilty under both counts of the indictment. Section 447 of the Code of Criminal Procedure permits the court, in a proper case, to direct the jury to reconsider a verdict of guilty, but forbids its reconsideration of a verdict of acquittal. The court should have received and entered the verdict of not guilty on the second count. Where part of the judgment is valid and the illegal part is severable from that part which is legal, the appellate court is authorized to reverse the illegal part and affirm the residue (Code Grim. Pro. § 543; see, also, Syracuse & Tully Plank Road Co. v. The People, 66 Barb. 25). We have examined the facts and find evidence sufficient to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment of conviction should be corrected (a) by reversing on the law that part which adjudges defendant guilty of the crime of assault, second degree, and sentences him to one to two years’ imprisonment on that charge and (b) by affirming that part which adjudges defendant guilty of the crime of sodomy. All concur. (The judgment convicts defendant of the crimes of sodomy and assault, second degree.) Present — Cunningham, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 A.D. 817, 49 N.Y.S.2d 124, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gold-nyappdiv-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack