People v. Goines

235 A.D.2d 432, 652 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 137
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 13, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [433] (Roman, J.), rendered July 1, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Rosario violations claimed by the defendant are unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Kane, 85 NY2d 1024, 1027; People v Rogelio, 79 NY2d 843, 844; People v Wright, 204 AD2d 372, 373; People v Ciro, 195 AD2d 568, 569). The defendant’s contention that he is entitled to a new trial because of prosecutorial misconduct is similarly unpreserved for appellate review (see, People v Comer, 73 NY2d 955; People v Medina, 53 NY2d 951). We decline to reach these issues in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. O’Brien, J. P., Florio, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Goines, 235 A.D.2d 432, 652 N.Y.S.2d 539, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 137 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

235 A.D.2d 432 (People v. Goines) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goines v. Walker
54 F. Supp. 2d 153 (E.D. New York, 1999)
People v. Goines
250 A.D.2d 621 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)