People v. Gogg
This text of 285 A.D.2d 842 (People v. Gogg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), entered May 8, 2000, which affirmed a judgment of the City Court of the City of Kingston denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the charges against them.
Defendants were charged with violating Kingston City Code § 300-5 (B) (6)
Pursuant to CPL 450.60 (3), County Court was the only intermediate appellate court to which defendants’ appeal could be taken (see, Town of Coeymans v Malphrus, 76 AD2d 1002). Its disposition could be further reviewed by the Court of Appeals upon a certificate issued by one of its Judges (see, CPL 450.90 [1]; 460.20 [2] [b]). Since no certificate has been issued and the time for application has expired (see, CPL 460.10 [5]), no transfer by this Court is required (see, NY Const, art VI, § 5 [b]). Lacking jurisdiction to review this matter, we dismiss the appeal.
[843]*843Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Carpinello and. Rose, JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed.
On December 16, 1999, such section was amended by Local Law No. 2 (2000) of the City of Kingston, approved January 3, 2000, currently codified at Kingston City Code § 300-5 (A) (6).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
285 A.D.2d 842, 727 N.Y.S.2d 361, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gogg-nyappdiv-2001.