People v. Godla

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Godla

183 N.W.2d 400, 27 Mich. App. 178, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1301

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 5, 1970

DocketDocket No. 7,917

StatusPublished

This text of 183 N.W.2d 400 (People v. Godla) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Godla, 183 N.W.2d 400, 27 Mich. App. 178, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1301 (Mich. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The people have moved to affirm defendant’s April 14, 1969, conviction by plea of guilty to attempted larceny in a building in violation of MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287) and MCLA § 750.360 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.592). GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

An examination of defendant’s brief and the record makes it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed on which decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The people have moved to affirm defendant’s April 14, 1969, conviction by plea of guilty to attempted larceny in a building in violation of MCLA § 750.92 (Stat Ann 1962 Rev § 28.287) and MCLA § 750.360 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.592). GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

An examination of defendant’s brief and the record makes it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed on which decision of the cause depends are so unsubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 N.W.2d 400, 27 Mich. App. 178, 1970 Mich. App. LEXIS 1301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-godla-michctapp-1970.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack